Single Table Inheritance
Pinia ORM supports Single Table Inheritance (STI) or Sub-classing through ES6 extension (use of the class ... extends ...
syntax). STI is a way to emulate object-oriented inheritance in a relational database. If you're coming from Ruby on Rails land, you may be familiar with it.
Basically, it will allow you to get different Model instance based on types of records in the same entity. For example, you might have users
entity, and you could have a field called type
and it could be Person
, Adult
, or Child
. Now, when you fetch these records, sometime it's useful if we can get each type in its own Model instance. Here is where STI comes in to play nicely.
Inheritance Conventions
In order to define inheritance in Pinia ORM, you need to follow some conventions. On each sub-entity of your hierarchy, you'll need to:
- Make sure the sub-entity class extends another Pinia ORM Model class.
- Add a reference to the base entity name along with the
static entity
reference. - Call
super.fields()
in thestatic fields
method to make sure to merge the sub-entity fields with the base one. - If you don't want your model to be saved in a different store also define
static types
and set atype
property if your data passed to the instance are not having it (its recommended always to set it)
// Base entity.
class Person extends Model {
static entity = 'person'
static fields () {
return {
id: this.attr(null),
name: this.attr('')
}
}
}
// Derived entity. You should extend the base entity.
class Adult extends Person {
static entity = 'adult'
// Call `super.fields()`` to merge fields.
static fields () {
return {
...super.fields(),
job: this.attr('')
}
}
}
Be aware that this example will save adult
in a seperate store adult
. If you want to have it saved in person
continue reading.
Interacting with Data
Once you defined a sub-class, you can insert
/ create
/ update
/ get
/ delete
entities using the Repository static methods. For instance, to create or insert data:
useRepo(Adult).insert({id: 1, name: 'John Doe', job: 'Software Engineer' })
And to fetch data:
const adults = useRepo(Adult).all()
/*
[
Adult { id: 1, name: 'John Doe', job: 'Software Engineer' },
Adult { id: 2, name: 'Jane Doe', job: 'Software Engineer' }
]
*/
Discriminator Field
When defining an inheritance model, one can use a discriminator field to dispatch entities based on this field value when inserting data using the base entity insert
or create
method.
By default, the entity field used as a discriminator field is the type
field. A static types
method also needs to be defined on the base entity. This method should return the mapping between discriminator field value and Model reference.
// Base entity.
class Person extends Model {
static entity = 'person'
static types () {
return {
PERSON: Person,
ADULT: Adult
}
}
static fields () {
return {
id: this.attr(null),
name: this.attr('')
}
}
}
// Derived entity.
class Adult extends Person {
static entity = 'adult'
static baseEntity = 'person'
static fields () {
return {
...super.fields(),
job: this.attr('')
}
}
}
Now, you can create mixed types of records at once.
// Creating mixed data.
useRepo(Person).insert([
{ type:'PERSON', id: 1, name: 'John Doe' },
{ type:'ADULT', id: 2, name: 'Jane Doe', job: 'Software Engineer' }
]
)
const people = useRepo(Person).all()
/*
[
Person { id: 1, name: 'John Doe' },
Adult { id: 2, name: 'Jane Doe', job: 'Software Engineer' }
]
*/
Discriminator Field Override
You may define a static typeKey
on the base entity of your hierarchy if you want to change the default discriminator field name.
// Base entity.
class Person extends Model {
static entity = 'person'
static typeKey = 'person_type'
static types () {
return {
PERSON: Person,
ADULT: Adult
}
}
static fields () {
return {
id: this.attr(null),
name: this.attr('')
}
}
}
// Derived entity.
class Adult extends Person {
static entity = 'adult'
static baseEntity = 'person'
static fields () {
return {
...super.fields(),
job: this.attr('')
}
}
}
And now you may use a custom type
field when inserting data.
useRepo(Person).insert([
{ person_type: 'PERSON', id: 1, name: 'John Doe' },
{ person_type: 'ADULT', id: 2, name: 'Jane Doe', job: 'Software Engineer' }
]
)
const people = useRepo(Person).all()
/*
[
Person { id: 1, name: 'John Doe' },
Adult { id: 2, name: 'Jane Doe', job: 'Software Engineer' }
]
*/
Exposing the Discriminator Field
Note that if the static fields
method doesn't expose the discriminator field (default or custom one), it will not be exposed in the results when fetching data. If you want to be able to read the discriminator field, you'll need to add it to the fields
method on the base entity:
// Base entity.
class Person extends Model {
static entity = 'person'
// static typeKey = 'person_type' // If your type field is not `type`
static types () {
return {
PERSON: Person,
ADULT: Adult
}
}
static fields () {
return {
id: this.attr(null),
name: this.attr(''),
type: this.attr('PERSON') // Exposing the discriminator field.
// person_type: this.attr('PERSON') // If your type field is not `type`
}
}
}
// Derived entity.
class Adult extends Person {
static entity = 'adult'
static baseEntity = 'person'
static fields () {
return {
...super.fields(),
job: this.attr(''),
type: this.attr('ADULT') // necessary fallback if you use the childRepo directly without type
// person_type: this.attr('ADULT') // If your type field is not `type`
}
}
}
Then you can fetch the key with its results.
// Creating mixed data
useRepo(Person).insert([
{ type:'PERSON', id: 1, name: 'John Doe' },
{ type:'ADULT', id: 2, name: 'Jane Doe', job: 'Software Engineer' }
])
const people = useRepo(Person).all()
/*
[
Person { id: 1, name: 'John Doe', type: 'PERSON' },
Adult { id: 2, name: 'Jane Doe', job: 'Software Engineer', type: 'ADULT' }
]
*/
You also need to set the type
field if you want to save data without its type
property but by store
useRepo(Adult).insert([
{ id: 2, name: 'Jane Doe', job: 'Software Engineer' }
])
useRepo(Person).insert([
{ id: 1, name: 'John Doe' }
])
/*
[
Person { id: 1, name: 'John Doe', type: 'PERSON' },
Adult { id: 2, name: 'Jane Doe', job: 'Software Engineer', type: 'ADULT' }
]
*//*
[
Person { id: 1, name: 'John Doe', type: 'PERSON' },
Adult { id: 2, name: 'Jane Doe', job: 'Software Engineer', type: 'ADULT' }
]
*/
Relationship Handling
Inheritance handles relation as any field:
- If the relation is defined on the base entity, it will be inherited by all sub-entities.
- If the relation is defined on a derived entity, only instances of this entity will be able to have related data.
Querying related data using the with
keyword (see this page) will fill the blank only when needed, particularly if you call the base entity getter with relation names specific to a sub-class.
class Person extends Model {
static entity = 'person'
static types () {
return {
PERSON: Person,
ADULT: Adult
}
}
static fields () {
return {
id: this.attr(null),
home_address_id: this.attr(null),
name: this.attr(''),
home_address: this.belongsTo(Address, 'home_address_id'),
type: this.attr('PERSON')
}
}
}
class Adult extends Person {
static entity = 'adult'
static baseEntity = 'person'
static fields() {
return {
...super.fields(),
work_address_id: this.attr(null),
job: this.attr(''),
work_address: this.belongsTo(Address, 'work_address_id'),
type: this.attr('ADULT')
}
}
}
class Address extends Model {
static entity = 'address'
static fields () {
id: this.attr(null),
city: this.string()
}
}
And let's see what would happen in this case.
useRepo(Address).insert([
{ id: 1, city: 'TOKYO' },
{ id: 2, city: 'PARIS' },
{ id: 3, city: 'BERLIN' }
])
useRepo(Person).insert({ id: 1, home_address_id: 1, name: 'John Doe' })
useRepo(Adult).insert({ id: 2, home_address_id: 2, work_address_id: 3, name: 'Jane Doe', job: 'Software Engineer' })
const people = useRepo(Person).query().with(['home_address', 'work_address']).get()
/*
[
Person {
id: 1,
home_address_id: 1,
name: 'John Doe',
home_address: Address { id: 1, city: 'TOKYO' },
},
Adult {
id: 2,
home_address_id: 2,
work_address_id: 3,
name: 'Jane Doe',
job: 'Software Engineer',
home_address: Address { id: 2, city: 'PARIS' },
work_address: Address { id: 3, city: 'BERLIN' }
}
]
*/
Example with decorators
If you are using decorators you need to use ...super.schemas[super.entity]
instead of ...super.fields()
.
class Animal extends Model {
static entity = 'animals'
@Attr(null) declare id: number | null
@Attr('animal') declare type: string
static types() {
return {
animal: Animal,
dog: Dog,
}
}
}
class Dog extends Animal {
static entity = 'dogs'
static baseEntity = 'animals'
static fields() {
return {
...super.schemas[super.entity],
}
}
@Attr('dog') declare type
@Attr('terrier') declare race: string
}
Notes on Circular Imports
If you decide to declare each entity model in a separate file, and use import
calls to cross-reference entity models between your file, you may get an error at runtime saying:
TypeError: Super expression must either be null or a function, not undefined.
If so, it means that you have cycles in your dependency tree and that your bundler doesn't handle them (usually they don't). We describe here a solution, inspired by Michel Weststrate's article.
Initial setup
Here is an example of the initial setup you might have:
Person.js
references its child Adult.js
because it needs it for type definition.
// File 1: Person.js
import { Model } from 'pinia-orm'
import Adult from './Adult'
export default class Person extends Model {
static entity = 'person'
static types () {
return {
PERSON: Person,
ADULT: Adult
}
}
static fields () {
return {
id: this.attr(null),
name: this.attr(''),
type: this.attr('PERSON')
}
}
}
Adult.js
references its parent model, through Person.js
.
// File 2: Adult.js
import Person from './Person'
export default class Adult extends Person {
static entity = 'adult'
static baseEntity = 'person'
static fields() {
return {
...super.fields(),
job: this.attr(''),
type: this.attr('ADULT')
}
}
}
Solution: How to Break Cycles
The solution, as presented in this article, is to use an intermediate file which imports and exports all entities used in the hierarchy.
// New file: PersonHierarchy.js
export * from './Person'
export * from './Adult'
You'll need to change the involved entities files to take into account the changes:
// File 1: Person.js
import { Model } from 'pinia-orm'
import { Adult } from './PersonHierarchy' // Here, we change the import.
// We export directly the named class.
export class Person extends Model {
static entity = 'person'
static types () {
return {
PERSON: Person,
ADULT: Adult
}
}
static fields () {
return {
id: this.attr(null),
name: this.attr(''),
type: this.attr('PERSON')
}
}
}
// We also export a default.
export default Person
// File 2: Adult.js
import { Person } from './PersonHierarchy' // Here, we change the import.
// import { Person } from './Person' // this should also work
// We export directly the named class.
export class Adult extends Person {
static entity = 'adult'
static baseEntity = 'person'
static fields() {
return {
...super.fields(),
job: this.attr(''),
type: this.attr('ADULT')
}
}
}
// We also export a default.
export default Adult;
Default Export
In our solution, we also expose a default
export in the different file, which can be used in subsequent files. Indeed, what is important in our case (in comparison with the generic case described in Michel Weststrate's article) is that the classes of a hierarchy and the store initialization file reference the intermediate file. But since all classes are "setup" when declaring the database, there is no risk in referencing the classes directly afterward (without going through the intermediate file).